Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42688419›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Cascading model of causal relationships in EMS ontogeny: integration of Piaget, Erikson, Bowlby, and Young paradigms.

Katarzyna Gutowska-Maślanka, Monika Talarowska-Dublicka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katarzyna Gutowska-MaślankaInstitute of Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Monika Talarowska-DublickaInstitute of Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The article presents a proposal for a model explaining the ontogeny of early maladaptive schemas (EMS) by linking classical developmental theories (Piaget, Erikson, Bowlby) with contemporary findings in the field of epigenetics. The proposed model indicates that EMS development is sequential in nature, involving interrelated cognitive, relational and biological levels. Early relational experiences, especially during periods of increased neurobiological plasticity, lead to permanent changes in the functioning of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and changes in gene expression associated with the regulation of stress responses (e.g., NR3C1, FKBP5). The dominance of assimilation processes over accommodation processes is conducive to the consolidation of rigid cognitive-emotional structures, which, along with the development of identity, take the form of integrated belief systems. The article introduces the concept of "biological lock", describing the state of stabilization of epigenetic and neurostructural changes responsible for the resistance of schemas to change. The cascade model developed in the present paper implies the need to modify therapeutic interventions toward a sequential approach, taking into account first the regulation of physiological processes (bottom-up), and then relational and cognitive interventions (top-down). This approach may increase the effectiveness of therapy in personality disorders, especially in cases of high resistance to treatment.

Indexed as

biological lockcascade modelearly maladaptive schemaspersonalityschema therapy

Identifiers

PMID42688419
PMCPMC13534085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.