ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
From screening to enrollment drop-offs: perspectives of minoritized participants in Indiana.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vaccine uptake among Black and Latine populations remains persistently lower than among white populations, yet drop-offs between screening and enrollment in clinical trials is underexamined. The current sociopolitical moment, marked by "DEI" rollbacks, disruptions of federally funded health research, and sensitivity to health equity language, heightens the urgency of this work and threatens infrastructure supporting equitable recruitment. This qualitative study investigated non-enrollment among individuals positively screened for a vaccine trial at Indiana University School of Medicine and the Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute. Seven themes emerged: institutional reputation; communication and awareness; healthcare professionals' role; public and community engagement; recruitment practices; research participant motivation; and barriers to enrollment. From a critical lens, the findings of this study make clear that closing the gap between interest and enrollment in clinical trials requires more than improved recruitment messaging but structural transformation within every step.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.