ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Reconceptualising mindfulness in Cambodia: Khmer translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The effects of a task shifted multi-component mental health intervention to support prosthetic and orthotic service users in Cambodia: a non-randomised controlled study.International journal of mental health systems · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Mindfulness is increasingly used in global mental health, yet its measurement tools are largely developed within Western cultural frameworks. This study aimed to (1) translate and culturally adapt the Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire (SMQ) into Khmer, (2) evaluate its cultural integrity among Cambodian adults with physical disabilities, and (3) examine the psychometric properties and factor structure of the measure. Methods: The SMQ was translated using a standardised forward-backward translation process with expert panel review and cognitive interviewing. Exploratory (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFA) were conducted on responses from 437 Cambodian participants with physical disabilities. Results: Following cultural adaptation, minor linguistic revisions were made to ensure conceptual equivalence. EFA and CFA supported a 14-item, six-factor structure comprising letting go, acceptance, non-judgement, cognitive-emotional reactivity, absence of aversion, and mindful observation. This structure demonstrated good model fit and internal consistency, diverging from the original Western single-factor model. Conclusion: This study provides a culturally adapted Khmer version of the SMQ with evidence of structural validity and internal consistency and offers evidence that the structure of mindfulness may vary across cultural contexts. The findings highlight the influence of Buddhist psychological concepts, particularly acceptance and reduced cognitive-emotional reactivity, in shaping the experience of mindfulness in Cambodia. The availability of this scale enables culturally grounded research and clinical practice and supports the development of contextually appropriate mindfulness-based interventions in low- and middle-income settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.