ArticleSichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition2026
[Structured Annotation and Information Extraction of Epilepsy Clinical Texts].
Article in Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop a fine-grained, highly comprehensive Chinese clinical texts named entity annotation schema tailored to the needs of epilepsy specialty clinical practice and research, and to validate its effectiveness in named entity recognition (NER) tasks. Methods: A three-level annotation schema covering 25 entity types was designed across seven major dimensions, including disease, disease course timeline, clinical manifestations, medical examinations, non-pharmacological treatments, medication, and influencing factors, with explicit label boundary definitions and rules for handling special expressions. De-identified inpatient records of epilepsy patients admitted to West China Hospital, Sichuan University from 2009 to 2023 served as the data source. Three annotators with epilepsy clinical backgrounds completed high-quality annotation of 804 cases, with annotation quality ensured through double annotation, expert arbitration, and entity-level inter-annotator agreement (IAA) evaluation. NER performance was validated using 10 model combinations comprising five Chinese medical pre-trained language models (Base-BERT, chinese-bert, chinese-Roberta, MC-BERT, MedBERT) paired with two sequence labeling frameworks (BiLSTM-CRF and GlobalPointer), with additional cross-domain generalization evaluation on an external case dataset established on the basis of published literature. Results: The final corpus contains 25 categories of epilepsy-related entities, 804 annotated cases, and a total of 28 400 entities. The IAA among the three annotators ranged from 0.86 to 0.88, indicating annotation consistency that met the accepted standards in computational linguistics. In NER validation, the GlobalPointer framework outperformed BiLSTM-CRF, achieving an overall Micro-F1 score of 0.906 and Macro-F1 score of 0.760. High-frequency core entities (e.g., seizure symptoms, drug names, and temporal information) all yielded F1 scores exceeding 0.90. In cross-domain validation on literature-based cases, high-frequency entity F1 scores remained above 0.80, while low-frequency entities (e.g., factors with incomplete/ambiguous induction [fac-inc-amb], treatment information [trt], and adverse drug reactions [dru-adv]) achieved F1 scores of 0.31-0.57, primarily attributable to limited sample size and high linguistic variability. Conclusion: The epilepsy-specific Chinese clinical annotation schema developed in this study demonstrates broad coverage, fine granularity, and high inter-annotator consistency. It effectively supports the training and evaluation of NER models and provides a reusable corpus foundation for the structured analysis of epilepsy medical records and the development of downstream intelligent diagnostic and therapeutic tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.