Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42688293›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in dental medicine2026

Efficacy of ethyl chloride topical anesthesia application on pain perception during intra-oral injections in children compared to benzocaine gel-a single-blind randomized controlled trial.

Nagah Abdelrahman, Manal Al Halabi, Mawlood Kowash, Iyad Hussein, Anas Salami

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06011005 (Efficacy of Ethyl Chloride Topical Anesthesia Application on the Pain Perception During Intra-oral Injections in Children in Comparison to Benzocaine Gel- a Single-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06011005 naunknown statusnot on this map

Efficacy of Ethyl Chloride Topical Anesthesia Application on the Pain Perception During Intra-oral Injections in Children in Comparison to Benzocaine Gel- a Single-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorMohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health SciencesRan2023 to 2023Enrolled42ConditionsDental Caries in Children, Anesthesia, Local, Injection Site DiscomfortArmsEthyl Chloride spray (group A), Benzocaine gel 20% (group B)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nagah AbdelrahmanHamdan Bin Mohammed College of Dental Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai Health, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Manal Al HalabiHamdan Bin Mohammed College of Dental Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai Health, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Mawlood KowashHamdan Bin Mohammed College of Dental Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai Health, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Iyad HusseinHamdan Bin Mohammed College of Dental Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai Health, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Anas SalamiHamdan Bin Mohammed College of Dental Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai Health, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pain management during local anesthesia administration is a critical factor in pediatric dentistry. This assessor-blind, parallel-group, superiority randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06011005) aimed to determine whether ethyl chloride (EC) spray applied via a cotton pellet provides superior pain reduction compared to 20% benzocaine (BC) gel during intra-oral local anesthetic injections in children. Methods: Fifty-seven healthy children aged 7-10 years requiring routine dental local anesthesia were randomized to Group A (20% BC gel, Results: Both groups demonstrated slight increases in HR following the injection; however, the magnitude of change was not significantly different between the groups (BC: +4.03 bpm vs. EC: +2.14 bpm; Mann-Whitney Conclusion: The superiority trial did not reveal a statistically significant difference between the use of ethyl chloride spray and 20% benzocaine gel across any of the measured outcomes. Both anesthetic agents produced comparable physiological responses, self-reported experiences, and behavioral reactions during intra-oral local anesthetic injections in cooperative children aged 7-10 years.

Indexed as

benzocainecryoanesthesiaethyl chloridelocal anesthesiapain perceptionpediatric dentistrytopical anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID42688293
PMCPMC13533958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.