ArticleSichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition2026
[Effect of Cancer Antigen-125 Elimination Rate Constant K and
Article in Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the predictive value of the cancer antigen-125 elimination rate constant K (KELIM) for treatment response and prognosis in patients with advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (NACT-IDS), and to analyze the combined prognostic significance of KELIM and the mutation status of breast cancer susceptibility gene ( Methods: A total of 106 patients with advanced HGSOC who had undergone NACT-IDS were retrospectively enrolled. The KELIM values during neoadjuvant chemotherapy were calculated, and patients were divided into high- and low-KELIM groups using a cutoff value of 1.0. Clinicopathological characteristics, R0 resection rates, and platinum sensitivity rates were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors for R0 resection, while Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed to evaluate factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS). Furthermore, the patients were stratified according to both KELIM and Results: The R0 resection rate was higher in the KELIM ≥ 1 group than in the KELIM < 1 group (77.1% vs 55.2%), and the difference was statistically significant ( Conclusion: KELIM is an effective dynamic biomarker for predicting surgical outcomes and PFS in patients undergoing NACT-IDS. Combined stratification by KELIM and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.