SynthesisFrontiers in sports and active living2026
The impact of self-modeling on athletic performance and self-efficacy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Self-modeling, as a pedagogical approach in physical education, can effectively promote students' acquisition of movement skills and enhance their self-efficacy. However, the efficacy of self-modeling interventions remains controversial, and there is currently no objective, comprehensive evidence demonstrating their effectiveness in physical education instruction. Methods: This study systematically evaluates the effects of self-modeling as an observational learning intervention on athletic performance and self-efficacy, along with its operational conditions, through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Results: Self-modeling yields moderate to large positive influences on athletic performance and significantly enhances self-efficacy to a moderate degree. One week after the intervention ended, however, the improvement in athletic performance did not persist. Regression analysis revealed that intervention dose was the primary factor influencing effectiveness, with larger doses yielding more pronounced effects. Age, exercise experience, skill classification, and control group intervention type did not demonstrate significant moderating effects. Discussion: The use of self-modeling in physical education and competitive sports can effectively enhance athletic performance and self-efficacy. However, its effects are dose-dependent and exhibit limited short-term sustainability. Future research should further clarify optimal intervention protocols and long-term mechanisms. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD420261477126, PROSPERO CRD420261477126.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.