ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Exploring factors influencing university students' participation in fecal microbiota donation: a descriptive qualitative study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To investigate the motivations and factors influencing university students' decisions to donate feces, and to provide recommendations to hospitals conducting fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) on specific actions to encourage students to participate in fecal donation. Design: Qualitative descriptive study. Methods: In-depth interviews were conducted with fecal donor volunteers using a semi-structured interview approach. Data were analyzed using NVivo 11.0 qualitative analysis software, following the methodology of descriptive qualitative research. Results: This study interviewed 30 college students and identified two themes and 11 sub-themes: motivations for fecal microbiota donation and barriers to participation. The primary incentives for fecal donors participating in the FMT program included financial incentives, a desire to help others, curiosity about FMT and its therapeutic benefits, the appeal of free health examinations, and the opportunity to support scientific research. Obstacles to participation included negative perceptions, disruption of normal life, overly stringent requirements for FMT donors, psychological barriers and discomfort with stool collection, cumbersome transportation procedures, and a lack of timely and comprehensive feedback on medical checkups. Conclusion: Addressing obstacles such as negative perceptions, disruption to normal life, stringent donor requirements, psychological discomfort, cumbersome transportation, and insufficient medical feedback is crucial for improving fecal donor recruitment and retention for FMT. Enhancing FMT awareness, emphasizing its benefits, and offering appropriate financial incentives may help motivate university students to donate. Implementing these strategies supports effective donor recruitment and management, advancing FMT therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.