ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Implementing contingency management to improve engagement among justice-involved clients referred for substance use disorder services.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Criminal justice involvement is prevalent among persons with substance use disorders (SUDs), for whom contingency management (CM) has been shown to increase treatment adherence. To support CM implementation by SUD organizations serving justice-involved clientele, effective technical assistance (TA) approaches are needed. This community case study details the sustainable implementation of CM that was achieved through support of an empirically supported TA approach. Methods: In the context of an interagency partnership, a university-based team employed a phased TA approach to support CM implementation by an SUD organization. This included the collaborative design of customized CM programming for clients referred by a local treatment court, with reinforcement targeting service initiation and engagement. Treatment staff completed preparatory training and skills-based coaching, and prepared facility systems (e.g., accounting, clinical records, and staff supervision) for a 6-month implementation period. Independent evaluation of clinical impacts compared CM-enrolled clients ( Results: All 10 treatment staff exceeded Discussion: This community case study demonstrates how SUD organizations may sustainably implement CM programming customized to local clinical needs and resources. Key aspects of the interagency partnership, funding for implementation costs, and the eventual sustainment decision are presented. We hope this will aid others in implementing CM to address local challenges posed by justice-involved clientele.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.