Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42688219›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

An enhanced multi-model ensemble learning architecture for robust network intrusion detection.

Dwarsala Sireesha, Kakelli Anil Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dwarsala SireeshaSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.
Kakelli Anil KumarSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately and in real-time identifying advanced cyber-attacks continues to be a serious challenge for modern Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS), especially in situations of highly imbalanced network traffic load and large-scale network attacks. Signature-based and single-model learning methods are typically ineffecive in capturing the complexity of traffic interactions and are not generalizable to new attack patterns. To overcome these limitations, this study introduces an Enhanced Multi-Model Ensemble Network Intrusion Detection System (EME-NIDS), a deep meta-learning system that combines five different heterogeneous learning paradigms, including Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Dense Neural Networks, Transformers, XGBoost, and Random Forests. The probabilistic output of the base learners is then condensed into a 220-dimensional meta-feature space and further processed by a five-layer deep meta-learner with approximately 289 k trainable parameters. A large-scale network flow dataset with 703,168 instances was used to assess the learning stability and attack detection of the minority class in the presence of various attacks, with 43 attacks and one attack class (benign) in the dataset. The experimental evaluation provided a detection accuracy of 95.65% and a macro-ROC-AUC score of 99.76%, outperforming all standalone models. Moreover, the proposed framework, which provides an average inference latency of 8.4 ms is suitable for real-time intrusion detection. The robustness, scalability and practical deployment capability of the proposed EME-NIDS framework were confirmed by statistical significance analysis (McNemar's test,

Indexed as

ADASYN oversamplingclass imbalance handlingensemble learningmeta-learningmulti-class attack classificationreal-time intrusion detectionstacked generalization

Identifiers

PMID42688219
PMCPMC13533919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.