ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Spatiotemporal evolution of innovation collaboration networks in China's AI medical device industry: implications for public health governance.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) medical devices have become an important technological foundation for enhancing healthcare system resilience and promoting the equitable allocation of medical innovation resources. However, limited attention has been paid to the distribution of upstream innovation resources and the spatial organization of this industry in the wake of the pandemic. Using AI medical device patent collaboration data from the Yangtze River Delta during 2018-2025, this study constructs local and external collaborative innovation networks and applies social network analysis and the Geodetector to examine their spatial evolution and associated factors across different phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. The results show that all innovation networks expanded continuously, particularly the external collaborative network. Nevertheless, cross-regional collaboration remained concentrated in a limited number of core cities, resulting in a persistent core-periphery structure. Regional GDP, retail market size, higher education resources, science expenditure, and financial support consistently exhibited strong explanatory power for collaboration intensity, while GDP growth and openness became increasingly associated with network differentiation following the COVID-19 shock. Moreover, the explanatory power of most variables was stronger for external collaboration than for local collaboration, suggesting that cross-regional knowledge exchange relies more heavily on comprehensive innovation capacity. This study advances the understanding of the spatial organization of AI medical innovation and provides empirical evidence for promoting a more balanced allocation of cross-regional medical R&D resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.