Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42688193›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

The Team Science Readiness Framework for scientific research collaboration.

Molly P Kilcullen, Ibrahim Bukhari, Mia Terkowitz, Sarah Stevens, Cyd Lacanienta, Michael Rosen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Molly P KilcullenSchool of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD United States.
Ibrahim BukhariSchool of Education, Johns Hopkins University School of Education, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Mia TerkowitzSchool of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD United States.
Sarah StevensSchool of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD United States.
Cyd LacanientaSchool of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD United States.
Michael RosenSchool of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD United States.

Funding

Johns Hopkins Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUM1TR004926 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN N. DAVIS, Daniel Ernest Ford · 2024 to 2026
$28.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Multidisciplinary research teams need a practical structure for assessing and improving their readiness to collaborate effectively. We developed the Team Science Readiness Framework (TSRF) to address this need. Methods: Team science considerations were initially identified by team science and healthcare experts, including the authors and affiliated collaborators, and were supplemented through a literature review. The framework was iteratively refined, prioritizing practical relevance, robust empirical support, and actionable factors that could be targeted through feasible interventions for improvement or sustainment. Results: The resulting TSRF comprises tangible, evaluable, and actionable considerations for science teams and provides a structure for organizing existing tools and resources. It addresses the research process across three stages: building teams during the early phases of a research project; managing teams while executing the research plan; and sustaining, growing, or gracefully closing teams as individual projects conclude. Discussion: By emphasizing actionable and empirically supported constructs, the TSRF offers a practical approach to evaluating multidisciplinary research-team readiness and guiding interventions throughout the team lifecycle.

Indexed as

frameworkreadinessscience teamsteam scienceteamwork

Identifiers

PMID42688193
PMCPMC13533812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.