ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2026
Computational mapping of resistance-relevant signals in proteins using deep and classical feature spaces.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The functional diversity of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) proteins necessitates advanced computational frameworks capable of capturing complex macromolecular signatures beyond simple sequence homology. While traditional alignment-based tools identify known resistance determinants, they often overlook the underlying biochemical and structural properties that define novel or divergent resistant macromolecules. Methods: This study systematically investigates the capacity of classical sequence-derived descriptors and deep protein language model (pLM) embeddings to resolve these essential functional characteristics at the protein level and contribute to predictive robustness and generalization. Multiple machine learning classifiers were trained using classical features, deep embeddings, and their integrated representations to assess the consistency of AMR-related signal detection. Results and discussion: Across models, both feature types demonstrated strong discriminative capacity while deep embeddings-based detection outperforming the classical features-based detection. Further, their integration did not produce substantial performance gains over deep embeddings alone, however it consistently improved stability and generalization across classifiers and validation settings. These findings indicate that classical descriptors encode resistance-relevant signals that complement contextual representations learned by protein language models. The AUROC values approached 0.85 for classical features alone, 0.97 for deep embeddings alone and 0.94 for integrated feature space across experimental configurations, confirming that alignment-free numerical representations effectively capture AMR-associated functional characteristics. Benchmarking against diverse AMR identification tools further demonstrates that classical and deep representations-based approaches maintain sensitivity toward divergent sequences while preserving high specificity, individually as well as collectively. All datasets, models, and scripts are publicly available at https://github.com/DrRahulKaushik/ProARG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.