Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42688147›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

From defeat to non-suicidal self-injury: the roles of entrapment and interpersonal relationship patterns in adolescence.

Xiaoting Zhu, Jiaqiong Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiaoting ZhuInstitute of Educational Sciences, Hunan University, Changsha, China.
Jiaqiong JiangInstitute of Educational Sciences, Hunan University, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Based on the integrated motivational-volitional model and the functional theory of self-injury, this study examined the association between defeat and adolescent non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), with entrapment as a mediator and interpersonal relationship patterns as moderators. Methods: Participants were 4,515 secondary school students (Mage = 15.24 years, SD = 1.66). Latent profile analysis was used to identify interpersonal relationship patterns across father-child, mother-child, peer, and teacher-student relationships. A moderated mediation model was then tested to examine the direct and indirect associations between defeat and NSSI across the identified profiles. Results: Overall, 33.9% of adolescents reported engaging in NSSI at least once. Defeat, entrapment, interpersonal relationships, and NSSI were significantly correlated, and entrapment partially mediated the association between defeat and NSSI. Four interpersonal relationship profiles were identified: low, moderate, and high interpersonal relationship groups and a father-child and teacher-student relationship deficit group. Interpersonal relationship profiles moderated both the direct association between defeat and NSSI and the association between defeat and entrapment. The defeat-NSSI association was strongest in the low interpersonal relationship group, whereas the defeat-entrapment association was strongest in the high interpersonal relationship group. Discussion: The findings indicate that entrapment is an important psychological mechanism linking defeat to adolescent NSSI and that the strength of these pathways varies across adolescents' interpersonal relationship configurations. Prevention efforts may benefit from addressing both defeat-related psychological processes and adolescents' broader relational contexts.

Indexed as

adolescentsdefeatentrapmentinterpersonal relationshipslatent profile analysisnon-suicidal self-injury

Identifiers

PMID42688147
PMCPMC13533888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.