ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
The algorithmic epistemic inversion in gastroenterology: how social media and psychological vulnerability fuel secondary risks in IBD and IBS management.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The unchecked proliferation of medical misinformation on short-video platforms has crystallized into a critical digital public health crisis. For patients managing chronic gastrointestinal diseases such as IBD and IBS, recommendation algorithms routinely override evidence-based medicine (EBM), engendering a phenomenon we term "algorithmic epistemic inversion." This inversion amplifies unproven "miracle cures" and fear-based narratives, driving population-level secondary risks, ranging from indiscriminate probiotic abuse and extreme elimination diets, malnutrition, and orthorexia nervosa. Although IBD and IBS are primarily gastrointestinal diseases, these algorithmically induced secondary risks impose severe, systemic damage on the central nervous system (CNS) and broader neurocognitive functions. To conceptualize this crisis, we introduce the novel framework of the Brain-Gut-Algorithm Axis, which delineates how algorithm-amplified anxiety acts as a social contagion exacerbating somatic symptoms through established gut-brain pathways. To counter this infodemic, we advocate for a public health governance framework grounded in AI-driven algorithmic pharmacovigilance. We urge policymakers and clinicians to recognize algorithm hegemony as a critical digital determinant of health by advancing health equity and integrating psychogastroenterology into routine clinical practice. This Perspective provides specific regulatory and clinical strategies that are crucial to protecting vulnerable populations and strengthening digital public health governance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.