Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42688117›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Motivational factors associated with intentions to pursue anesthesiology among medical students: a cross-national study.

Marie Kratzer, Milena Abbiati, Nadia M Bajwa, Georges L Savoldelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marie KratzerDivision of Anesthesiology, Department of Acute Care Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Milena AbbiatiUnit of Development and Research in Medical Education (UDREM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Nadia M BajwaUnit of Development and Research in Medical Education (UDREM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Georges L SavoldelliDivision of Anesthesiology, Department of Acute Care Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Understanding what motivates students to choose a specialty can be a lever for shaping choices aligned with the needs of the healthcare system. This study aimed to determine students' intentions to pursue anesthesiology and to identify the motivational factors associated with these intentions in two different training systems. Methods: This is a cross-sectional observational study (2018-2021) based on a self-administered questionnaire completed by final year medical students in France and Switzerland. Principal component analysis and Cronbach's alpha were performed to provide preliminary evidence of internal structure and internal consistency of a revised version of the Motivational Career Choice Questionnaire (MCCQ-R). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify demographic and motivational factors associated with anesthesiology career intentions. Results: A total of 703 participants were included (response rate 74, 62% women). The average proportion of undergraduates intending to choose anesthesiology was 7.7% ( Conclusion: "Diverse scope of practice" and "working conditions," as measured by the MCCQ-R, are associated with students' intention to choose anesthesiology as a specialty. Emphasizing these aspects during medical training could help attract students to the specialty.

Indexed as

anesthesiologycareer choicecareer intentionsmedical studentsmotivational factorsspecialty selection

Identifiers

PMID42688117
PMCPMC13533747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.