SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2026
The subtle science: a systematic review of psilocybin magic mushroom and truffle microdosing.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Microdosing psilocybin magic mushrooms (MM) and truffles has grown in popularity, but the evidence supporting reported benefits remains poorly characterized. The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize the existing literature on microdosing psilocybin MM and truffles in adults to determine reported health effects and perceived benefits, motivations for use, dosing protocols and preparations, adverse events, and competing interests. Methods: This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42023428107). Studies of adults microdosing psilocybin MM or truffles were eligible. Risk of bias was assessed across included studies. Results: Eleven articles (five quantitative and six qualitative studies) met inclusion criteria. Studies were conducted in the United States (n=4), Netherlands, Argentina, and internationally (n=2 each), and Slovenia (n=1) with a total sample of 3,262 adults. Some studies reported microdosing psilocybin MM or truffles may improve well-being, mental health, cognition, physical health, creativity, relationships, pain, curiosity, and substance dependence, and enhance senses among adults. However, the majority of evidence had at least some concerns for risk of bias or was qualitative and used a variety of self-reported outcome measures. Approximately 86% of microdoser motivations were non-medical and only 14% were related to medical diagnoses, mostly for mental health improvements. Extreme heterogeneity was identified across dosing protocols and preparations. The majority of studies did not report adverse events but for those reported, they were mostly mild. All but four studies declared no conflicts of interest and four did not disclose funding sources. Discussion: The certainty of the evidence is low, and a causal effect of microdosing cannot be inferred. Future research should prioritize well-powered randomized controlled trials with standardized and substance-specific dosing protocols to determine causal relationships between microdosing MM or truffles and health outcomes. Mandatory reporting of adverse events and funding sources should be implemented to build the safety profile of microdosing MM and truffles and ensure transparency for potential conflicts of interest. Sytematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023428107.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.