ArticleTurkish journal of surgery2026
Turkish version of the Carolinas comfort scale: Validation and long-term clinical outcomes after mesh-based inguinal hernia repair.
Article in Turkish journal of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Mesh-based inguinal hernia repair has reduced recurrence rates; however, long-term postoperative symptoms remain clinically relevant. The Carolinas comfort scale (CCS) is a disease-specific tool developed to assess these outcomes. This study aimed to validate the Turkish version of the CCS and evaluate long-term quality of life. Material and Methods: The CCS was translated and culturally adapted using standardized procedures. A retrospective cohort of patients who underwent elective inguinal hernia repair with mesh between 2018 and 2020 was analyzed. Reliability, validity, and factor structure were evaluated using established statistical methods. Results: A total of 85 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 79 months. The Turkish CCS demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.952), strong convergent validity with VAS (ρ=0.952, p<0.001), and significant discriminative validity for chronic pain (p<0.001). The recurrence and chronic pain rates were 10.6% and 35.3%, respectively. Conclusion: The Turkish version of the CCS is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing long-term outcomes after mesh-based inguinal hernia repair and can be used in both clinical practice and research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.