ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Does tumor location affect irreversible electroporation outcomes in pancreatic cancer? A head-to-head comparative cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a promising non-thermal ablative modality for advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). However, whether tumor location influences outcomes remain unclear due to distinct anatomical relationships between the pancreatic head/neck and body/tail. This study compared the safety, efficacy, and survival outcomes of IRE between patients with pancreatic head/neck and body/tail tumors. Methods: We analyzed a real-world cohort of 63 consecutive patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (comprising primary, post-resection recurrent, and oligometastatic diseases) who underwent percutaneous CT-guided IRE between March 2018 and July 2024. Patients were stratified into the head/neck group (n=39) and the body/tail group (n=24). Baseline characteristics, procedural parameters, adverse events, overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and tumor marker changes (CA19-9/CEA) were compared. Results: Median age was 66 years (head/neck) versus 61 years (body/tail) ( Conclusions: In this cohort of patients with relatively low BMI, percutaneous CT-guided IRE demonstrated comparable safety and efficacy between pancreatic head/neck and body/tail locations. Tumor location alone may not limit IRE feasibility; however, caution is needed when generalizing these findings to Western populations with higher BMI, and larger prospective studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.