SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
Temporal trends in the prevalence of Alzheimer's disease, 1980-2024: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the primary cause of dementia and represents a significant public health concern in aging populations. Existing evidence indicates geographic and sex-related differences in AD prevalence; however, comparability across time periods and diagnostic criteria is limited, and data from lower-resource regions remain scarce. This study synthesized evidence on reported AD prevalence from 1980 to 2024 and examined temporal, geographic, demographic, and methodological variation. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were systematically searched from inception to December 31, 2024, for observational studies reporting AD prevalence in general or community-based populations. Eligible studies reported prevalence estimates with 95% confidence intervals or provided sufficient data for calculation. Studies with sample sizes below 100 and non-original reports were excluded. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data; disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. Pooled reported prevalence was estimated using a random-effects model. The review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251111597). Results: Fifty-two studies from 19 countries met the inclusion criteria. The pooled reported prevalence of AD was 4.43 per 100 population (95% CI 3.47-5.50). Prevalence was higher among females (4.65 per 100, 95% CI 3.37-6.13) than males (2.30 per 100, 95% CI 1.71-2.97). By survey period, reported prevalence was 3.52 per 100 for 1980-1989, 4.21 for 1990-1999, 4.12 for 2000-2009, and 6.78 for 2010-2024. Adjusted meta-regression did not identify a significant association between survey year and reported prevalence. Estimates also varied by WHO region, Human Development Index (HDI) level, sample size, and study design. Conclusions: Reported AD prevalence was substantial and varied by demographic, geographic, and methodological factors. Although prevalence was highest in the most recent survey period, meta-regression did not indicate a consistent global increase over time. Given the extremely high between-study heterogeneity, these findings should be interpreted with caution. More standardized, age-comparable, and geographically representative studies are needed, particularly in underrepresented and lower-resource settings. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251111597, identifier CRD420251111597.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.