ArticleResearch square2026
A Changing Paradigm: The Swift Expansion of Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation for MASH Cirrhosis.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) provides a lifesaving option for patients with end-stage liver disease who may not be prioritized for deceased donor transplantation under the current model for end-stage liver disease (MELD)-based allocation system. Although prior studies have demonstrated a survival benefit for LDLT compared with remaining on the waitlist, limited data account for evolving liver disease epidemiology and donor characteristics in the United States. Methods: Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients/United Network of Organ Sharing (SRTR/UNOS), we conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of adult LDLT recipients and donors from 2000 to 2024. Trends were assessed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression. Results: A total of 7,686 LDLT recipients were identified. Indications included cholestatic liver disease (23%), hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (16%), metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) (15%), and alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) (14%). MELD scores at LT varied by etiology, with higher scores in MASH and ALD. From 2000 to 2024, LDLT for MASH increased 5.4-fold (5.6% to 30.2%), while HCV declined sharply after 2014. LDLT for ALD remained stable despite increasing waitlist registrations. MASH recipients were more likely to receive grafts from younger related donors and less likely from older related donors or spouses compared with cholestatic liver disease. Conclusions: MASH is the fastest-growing indication for LDLT in the United States. These findings highlight limitations of MELD-based allocation and suggest a need to address donor eligibility barriers to improve equitable access to transplantation across liver disease etiologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.