Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42687964›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Best friends' and adolescents' depressive symptoms in early adolescence: gendered pathways and distinct roles of peer acceptance.

Yiqun Yang, Xiangjuan Tian, Qiuxu Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yiqun YangSchool of Marxism, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, China.
Xiangjuan TianSchool of Psychology, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, China.
Qiuxu ZhangSchool of Marxism, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Although best friends' depressive symptoms have been linked to adolescents' own depressive symptoms, inconsistent findings point to the need to examine potential pathways and the peer-status contexts in which these links unfold. Methods: Using cross-sectional data from 939 Chinese early adolescents (Mage = 13.31 years; 49.2% girls), this study tested whether best friends' depressive symptoms were associated with adolescents' depressive symptoms through friendship quality and rumination, and whether these associations varied according to peer acceptance of best friends and adolescents themselves. Depressive symptoms, friendship quality, and rumination were assessed using self-reports, whereas peer acceptance and best-friend identification were obtained through peer nominations. Results: Among girls, best friends' depressive symptoms were indirectly associated with adolescents' depressive symptoms through poorer friendship quality and greater rumination. Among boys, these indirect pathways were not significant; however, the association between best friends' depressive symptoms and boys' own symptoms was stronger when best friends' peer acceptance was higher. Among girls, higher peer acceptance was related to a weaker association between rumination and depressive symptoms and a smaller indirect association through rumination. Discussion: These findings highlight potentially different patterns across gender-stratified analyses and the peer-status contexts of both adolescents and their best friends in understanding adolescent depressive symptoms.

Indexed as

adolescents’ depressive symptomsbest friends’ depressive symptomsfriendship qualitygenderpeer acceptancerumination

Identifiers

PMID42687964
PMCPMC13533713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.