ArticleResearch square2026
Toward uncertainty-aware clinical decision support for treatment response prediction in metastatic NSCLC: integrating FDG-PET, T-cell repertoire, and cytokines with conformal prediction.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04151940 (An Interventional Study of PET/CT Changes During Chemoimmunotherapy and Radiation Therapy for Patients With Metastatic NSCLC), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Interventional Study of PET/CT Changes During Chemoimmunotherapy and Radiation Therapy for Patients With Metastatic NSCLC (PET Bright)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Variable response to chemoimmunotherapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), together with the limited discriminative accuracy of PD-L1 tumor proportion score, highlights the need for reliable, uncertainty-aware early response prediction using multimodal biomarkers. We developed and prototyped a multimodal clinical decision support (CDS) framework integrating longitudinal FDG-PET, T-cell receptor (TCR), and cytokine biomarkers with conformal prediction to deliver uncertainty-quantified, patient-level response predictions. Methods: Thirty-five patients with mNSCLC receiving first-line carboplatin-pemetrexed-pembrolizumab on the PET-BRIGHT trial (NCT04151940) underwent FDG-PET/CT and blood collection at baseline and week 3. Multimodal biomarkers included FDG-PET metrics (standardized uptake value/total lesion glycolysis), TCR diversity metrics, and inflammatory cytokines. Nested leave-one-out cross-validation with automated feature selection identified a single biomarker per modality. Class-balanced logistic regression was used for classification, with discrimination assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and calibration by the Brier score. Conformal prediction (targeting 80% reliability) quantified patient-level uncertainty via prediction sets and singleton rate. Unimodal and multimodal early- and late-fusion models were evaluated using baseline-only and combined baseline plus mid-treatment biomarkers. Models were benchmarked against PD-L1 tumor proportion score, and statistical significance was assessed by permutation testing against an empirical null. Results: PD-L1 tumor proportion score, the current clinical standard, discriminated poorly (AUROC 0.58, 95% CI 0.39-0.78). At PreTx, unimodal TCR was the strongest single modality (AUROC 0.80), followed by PET (0.76) and cytokines (0.54). Late fusion of PET and TCR achieved the highest PreTx discrimination (0.85) and increased singleton predictions from 78% to 89%. After incorporating mid-treatment biomarkers, cytokines became the strongest single modality (0.78) while TCR was attenuated (0.66); late fusion of PET and cytokines achieved the highest discrimination overall (0.86). Thirteen of 22 model and timepoint combinations exceeded a permutation null at p < 0.05, and empirical coverage was 78% and 82% against an 80% target. Conclusions: A multimodal framework combining longitudinal biomarkers with conformal prediction substantially outperformed the current clinical standard while identifying patients for whom a confident prediction could not be made. A prototype CDS interface demonstrates feasibility for clinical translation. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04151940, registered 26 September 2019.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.