ArticleResearch square2026
Hydroxychloroquine-Induced Retinopathy in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Predictors of Progression Following Drug Discontinuation.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a cornerstone of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) management. However, the medication can accumulate within organs and cause toxicity including retinopathy. HCQ is usually discontinued once ocular toxicity is diagnosed, but this is not always sufficient to avoid further damage. Whether retinal injury progresses following HCQ cessation, and which patients are at risk, is of great interest. Prior studies examining progression after HCQ discontinuation are sparse and limited by small sample sizes, and none specifically examine patients with SLE. This study aimed to identify predictors of progression of HCQ-induced retinopathy in SLE patients after medication discontinuation. Methods: We queried the NYU Lupus Cohort to identify patients with documented HCQ-induced retinopathy who discontinued HCQ and had at least one optical coherence tomography (OCT) follow-up to assess for progression. Demographic information, cumulative HCQ dose, duration of therapy, presence of chronic kidney disease or tamoxifen use, SLE disease activity, and ophthalmologic follow-up intervals were collected. Two ophthalmologists independently reviewed OCT and Humphrey visual field data to confirm retinopathy, grade its severity, and determine progression following drug discontinuation. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables and Chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Results: Twenty-one patients with confirmed HCQ retinopathy were included. The mean duration of HCQ therapy preceding diagnosis was 16.2 years and the mean cumulative exposure was 1884 g. Retinal toxicity progressed in 6 patients (28.6%) despite HCQ discontinuation. There appeared to be a trend towards a greater likelihood of progression with more severe retinal toxicity at the time of diagnosis. However, there were no differences between progressors and non-progressors with respect to age at diagnosis, duration or cumulative HCQ exposure, SLE disease activity, tamoxifen use, chronic kidney disease, or guideline-concordant care. Conclusions: Nearly thirty percent of patients with SLE and HCQ retinopathy progressed despite drug discontinuation. No baseline clinical predictors were associated with progression, though there was a descriptive trend toward greater risk with more severe baseline retinopathy. These data emphasize the importance of continued ocular surveillance for progression of toxicity after discontinuation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.