ArticleResearch square2026
Pre-treatment T-cell Transcriptional Signatures Predict Immunotherapy Outcomes in Melanoma.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved outcomes for patients with melanoma and are now the standard of care for high-risk and advanced disease. However, long-term benefits are observed in only around 25% of patients, with significant risk for immune-related adverse events, highlighting the need for predictive biomarkers. To develop a minimally invasive, pre-treatment biomarker strategy, we profiled functional and subset-specific transcripts in peripheral blood T lymphocytes (PBTLs) and applied machine learning to identify predictive signatures. Patients were enrolled prior to receiving ICI monotherapy in the adjuvant (Exploratory n=61, Validation=78) or metastatic (Exploratory n=48, Validation=46) settings. Following feature selection, random forest models were trained and benchmarked against empirical null models. In the adjuvant setting, CD160 and GZMB predicted recurrence (95th percentile), while treatment-limiting toxicity was predicted by a signature comprising TNFRSF18, VTCN1, TIGIT, CCR4, and AHR (97th percentile). In the metastatic setting, baseline CD45RB, a marker of T-cell differentiation, most strongly predicted progression within one year (93.9th percentile). Distinct signatures in the adjuvant and metastatic settings suggest differences in T-cell programs associated with patient outcomes. These findings support further evaluation of pre-treatment circulating T-cell transcriptional profiles as predictors of ICI response and toxicity in melanoma.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.