Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42687901›Full record

ArticleResearch square2026

Exposing the Value of Receiving and Giving Help across 12 European Countries: a Longitudinal Analysis of Self-Perceived Health.

Hans Gevers

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hans GeversEstonian Business School, Department Research, Development & PhD Studies.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0249-4142

Funding

Enhancing the Comparability of SHARE with HRS and ELSAR01AG052527 · NIA · MAX PLANCK INST/SOCIAL LAW/SOCIAL POLICY · PI BOERSCH-SUPAN, AXEL H · 2016 to 2020
$2.1M
NIA NIH HHS HHSN271201300071CNIA NIH HHS R01 AG052527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The act of receiving and giving help is commonly expected to improve older people's health. In this article, this expectation is explored through a longitudinal analysis of a representative sample of 29,995 respondents aged 59 to 89 in 2011 from 12 European countries documented in the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) for the period 2011 to 2022. An unordered correlated random-effects (CRE), an ordered fixed-effects logistic (FEO), as well as an ordered random-effects logistic panel estimator (REO), all with longitudinal calibrated weights, are used to estimate the relationship between self-perceived health, receiving, and giving help. Additionally, a stereotype ordered logistic estimator (SO) is included to support the detected interaction effect between receiving and giving help. Overall, the study documents the positive impact on self-reported health status of income, doing activities and being satisfied with life, as well as the negative impact of age and having limitations. The Danish older people report the best health status, followed by the Swedes and the Swiss. Moreover, the study highlights that receiving help relates to worse self-perceived health, and that giving help relates to better self-perceived health. Above all, the study reveals the potential of the act of giving help to improve the self-perceived health status, in particular of those who receive help.

Indexed as

European Uniongiving and receiving helplongitudinalolder peopleself-perceived health

Identifiers

PMID42687901
PMCPMC13532749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.