ArticleResearch square2026
Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Improve Memory Function and Decrease Neuropathology in APP/PS1 Mice.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors have shown therapeutic potential in aging and Alzheimer's disease (AD), direct comparisons of nonselective and selective HDAC inhibitors across aging and AD models are lacking. We compared the effects of the broad-spectrum HDAC inhibitor valproic acid (VPA) and the selective class I HDAC inhibitors entinostat (MS-275) and tacedinaline (CI-994) in 3-, 12-, and 18-month-old wild-type and APP/PS1 mice. Mice received 30 days of treatment, followed by a series of behavioral tests assessing different memory domains. Brain tissue was then analyzed for molecular and pathological changes. Both MS-275 and CI-994 improved recognition memory and short-term working memory in 12- and 18-month-old APP/PS1 mice, whereas only CI-994 restored long-term spatial reference memory. CI-994 increased hippocampal synapse-related gene expression and H3K9 acetylation at their promoters, consistent with improved hippocampus-dependent memory. In contrast, MS-275 enhanced synapse-related gene expression and H3K9 acetylation, in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), corresponding to improvements in recognition and working memory. MS-275 also significantly reduced amyloid plaque burden in the hippocampus and PFC, whereas both MS-275 and CI-994 decreased microglial density in APP/PS1 mice. These findings demonstrate distinct spatial and functional effects of selective HDAC inhibition in AD. CI-994 primarily targets hippocampal synaptic plasticity to improve long-term spatial memory, whereas MS-275 preferentially modulates PFC synaptic function and reduces amyloid pathology, leading to improved recognition and working memory. Together, these results identify region-specific HDAC mechanisms that differentially regulate cognitive function and AD pathology, supporting selective HDAC inhibition as a promising therapeutic strategy for AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.