ArticleArXiv2026
Effects of Quantum Noise and Source Blurring on Dark-Field Signal Retrieval in X-ray Speckle-Based Imaging.
Article in ArXiv, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
X-ray speckle-based dark-field imaging offers high sensitivity to sub-pixel structural features, yet its quantitative reliability in clinical and preclinical settings remains constrained by low photon flux and finite focal spot sizes. However, how hardware-induced noise and source blurring propagate through retrieval algorithms to degrade signal integrity is not fully understood. Here, we systematically evaluate algorithm robustness-quantified by signal linearity, sensitivity, and bias-under photon starvation and source blurring across two mathematically distinct frameworks: differential-based intrinsic tracking (Low-Coherence System, LCS) and patch-wise explicit tracking (X-ray Speckle-Tracking Speckle-Vector-Tracking, XST-XSVT). Our experimental results demonstrate that input speckle pattern distortions propagate through retrieval algorithms in fundamentally different ways depending on algorithm architecture. As an example, using our setup, under severe photon starvation (exposure reduced from 50 s to 1 s per mask step), derivative noise amplification in LCS causes its dark-field signal linearity and sensitivity to drop precipitously by 85.7% and 91.3%, respectively, while sharply elevating baseline bias. In contrast, XST-XSVT restricts these losses to 37.4% for linearity and 64.2% for sensitivity while maintaining a stable baseline, as its patch-wise variance calculation inherently suppresses stochastic noise. Similarly, under blur-limited conditions (expanding focal spot size from 7
Identifiers
42687892PMC13532704What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.