ArticleArXiv2026
Physics-Assisted Deep Learning Denoising for Stabilized IMPULSED dMRI Microenvironment Parameter Fitting.
Article in ArXiv, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Diffusion-weighted MRI (dMRI) is a powerful tool for quantifying cellular microenvironment parameters. However, the inherently low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of dMRI can compromise the accuracy and reliability of parameter estimation. This study proposes a physics-assisted deep learning (DL)-based denoising framework designed to enhance dMRI signal quality and improve the robustness of subsequent biophysical model fitting, with potential relevance to low-SNR settings such as clinical 1.5 T MRI acquisitions. Approach: A dataset of paired noise-free and Rician-noise-corrupted dMRI signals was generated using the IMPULSED-dMRI signal model. Three denoising architectures were evaluated: Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks. Denoised signals were then fitted to estimate cell diameter Main results: DL-based processing substantially improved dMRI signal denoising. The MLP and LSTM achieved similar performance, with the LSTM slightly better overall, and both outperformed the CNN. Averaged across all signals, the LSTM reduced denoising MAE from 5.97% to 1.58%. In the subsequent model fitting step, the LSTM produced modest reductions in parameter MAE, from 5.34 Significance: The proposed framework improves dMRI signal quality and stabilizes subsequent IMPULSED-based microenvironmental parameter fitting. The primary value of this approach is improved fitting reliability under noisy dMRI conditions, with secondary gains in parameter accuracy, and it warrants further validation in heterogeneous tissues and
Indexed as
Identifiers
42687865PMC13532709What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.