Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42687714›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of biological anthropology2026

The Oral Microbiome of King Richard III of England.

Irina M Velsko, Alexander Hübner, Zandra Fagernäs, James A Fellows Yates, Allison E Mann, Courtney A Hofman, Andrew T Ozga, Cecil M Lewis, Camilla Speller, Sarah Fiddyment and 6 more

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of biological anthropology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Irina M VelskoDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9810-9917
Alexander HübnerDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Zandra FagernäsGlobe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
James A Fellows YatesDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5585-6277
Allison E MannDepartment of Anthropology, University of Wyoming, Wyoming, Laramie, USA.
Courtney A HofmanDepartment of Anthropology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6808-3370
Andrew T OzgaDepartment of Anthropology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.
Cecil M LewisDepartment of Anthropology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.
Camilla SpellerDepartment of Anthropology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Sarah FiddymentDepartment of Archaeology, University of York, York, UK.
Michael FranckenState Office for Cultural Heritage Baden-Württemberg, Konstanz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6336-2111
Joachim WahlInstitute for Archaeological Sciences, Section Paleoanthropology, University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Johannes KrauseDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Anita RadiniSchool of Archaeology, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Turi KingGenetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Christina WarinnerDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4528-5877

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence StrategyMax Planck Harvard Research Center for the Archaeoscience of the Ancient Mediterranean (MHAAM)Max Planck SocietyWerner Siemens Stiftung
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMetagenomic investigations of ancient dental calculus provide insights into oral health, disease, and diet. Here, we analyze the dental calculus metagenome of King Richard III of England (1452-1485). MATERIALS AND

methodsDental calculus DNA was extracted from three teeth of King Richard III and shotgun sequenced to a depth of nearly 400 million reads. The metagenomic data were taxonomically profiled and compared to new and previously published dental calculus metagenomes from England, Ireland, the Netherlands, and Germany spanning the Neolithic to the present. Sequencing data were de novo assembled, and metagenome-assembled genomes assigned to the genus Tannerella were investigated for phylogenetic relatedness and virulence. Putative dietary DNA was assessed for authenticity.

resultsThe dental calculus of King Richard III was well-preserved and yielded an exceptionally high quantity of DNA. Oral microbiome species diversity fell within the range previously observed among other northern European populations, suggesting that a royal lifestyle and a rich diet did not substantially impact his oral microbiota. The reconstructed Tannerella genomes contained many virulence factors found today among oral Tannerella species. No putative dietary DNA could be authenticated. DISCUSSION: The dental calculus of King Richard III produced one of the richest ancient oral metagenomes published to date, yet the species diversity was indistinguishable from that of commoners living in northern Europe over the last 7000 years. Insufficient plant and animal DNA were recovered to investigate diet, suggesting that dental calculus may not be a sufficient source of dietary DNA even when exceptionally well-preserved.

Indexed as

Dental CalculusMicrobiotaMouthDNA, AncientEnglandHistory, 15th CenturyHistory, AncientHistory, MedievalHumansMetagenomePhylogenyDNA, Ancientancient DNAdental calculusdental plaquehuman microbiomemedievalmetagenomicsperiodontal diseaseTannerella forsythia

Identifiers

PMID42687714
PMCPMC13539363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.