Observational studyInternational wound journal2026
A Decision-Aid Improves Clinician Practice and Associated Patient Compression Stocking Adherence.
Observational study in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Decision-Aid Improves Clinician Practice and Associated Patient Compression Stocking Adherence.International wound journal · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adherence to compression stocking wear is essential for reducing venous leg ulcer recurrence, yet adherence rates remain low. This study examined the relationship between a novel digital clinical decision-aid (the Personalized and Multidimensional Compression Assessment and Intervention [PAMCAI]), clinician practice, and patient adherence with compression stocking use, by embedding a prospective comparative cohort study within a pilot randomized controlled trial. The clinical notes of occupational therapists using PAMCAI were compared with those not using PAMCAI on their documentation of adherence and frequency of wear, identification of patient-specific barriers and attempts to address barriers. The relationship between higher documentation scores and patient adherence was also explored. Thirty-six medical records from 18 patients demonstrated significantly higher documentation scores when PAMCAI was used for all three categories (p < 0.001). Improvements in adherence were positively associated with documentation quality in the targeted categories (p < 0.001). These findings indicate that PAMCAI supports practice changes that translate to improved patient adherence, highlighting the potential value of clinician-focused decision-aids in venous leg ulcer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.