ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2026
A Descriptive Analysis of a Rural Telehospital Medicine Program in the Veterans Health Administration: A Multi-Facility, Mixed-Methods Evaluation.
Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe Veterans Health Administration (VHA) reports provider shortages in up to 86% of their hospitals, with rural VHA Medical Centers (VAMCs) disproportionately affected. To address this, the VHA's Office of Rural Health launched the Telehospital Medicine Program to provide hospitalist coverage in understaffed facilities. This evaluation describes adoption and expansion of this program across six rural VHA hospitals.
methodsUsing a mixed-methods approach guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance framework, we evaluated implementation across six VHA facilities. Reach was assessed by measuring the number of inpatient bed days of care at rural facilities served by the Telehospital Medicine Program. Costs were evaluated through a budget impact analysis, while adoption, implementation, and maintenance were examined using facility-, provider-, and individual-level metrics, and staff and Veteran interviews and surveys.
findingsOn average, the Telehospital Medicine Program covered an average of 87 beds per day, with a range of 50-395 beds per day across the six facilities analyzed. Estimated savings for the facilities served range from $72K to $1.05M per year, equivalent to a reduction on average of ∼1.5 full-time equivalents of on-site providers, with the largest hospitals perceiving the largest savings. Additionally, no increases in length of stay, hospital readmissions, or mortality rates were observed following implementation. Factors influencing adoption include "hesitancy among newer nurses," "training components for residents and advanced practice providers," and "technology logistics." Staff found the program easy to integrate and effective in filling care gaps. Maintenance remained robust 6 months after implementation.
conclusionsThe VHA's rural Telehospital Medicine Program demonstrated scalability, adaptability, and sustainability across a variety of practice settings-highlighting the program's ability to meet varying staffing needs across rural VHA facilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.