ArticleJournal of clinical pharmacology2026
Population pharmacokinetics for the CTLA-4 modulator gotistobart in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Article in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gotistobart is an investigational, next-generation, humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4. It is engineered to preserve cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 through endosomal recycling while enhancing intratumoral regulatory T-cell depletion. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed to characterize gotistobart pharmacokinetics and identify covariates contributing to inter-individual variability in patients with advanced solid tumors. Serum concentration-time data were obtained from 632 patients enrolled in three phase I-III clinical trials. In total, 3406 pharmacokinetic observations across a dose range from 0.1 to 10 mg/kg were collected. A two-compartment model with linear elimination best described the data, with inter-individual variability on clearance, central volume, and peripheral volume. Parameter estimates were precise, with typical values of 0.005 L/h for clearance, 0.021 L/h for inter-compartmental clearance, 2.59 L for central volume, and 3.43 L for peripheral volume. Covariates identified in the model included body weight and albumin on clearance and volumes, and sex on volumes, with limited clinically relevant impact. The model was evaluated using parameter precision, goodness-of-fit diagnostics, and prediction-corrected visual predictive checks. The model was used to simulate concentration-time profiles for clinically relevant dosing regimens. Simulations demonstrated the expected steady-state pharmacokinetic behavior, with dose-dependent increases in peak and trough concentrations. Compared with 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks, administration of two 10 mg/kg loading doses followed by 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks accelerated the attainment of steady state. The validated population pharmacokinetic model provides a quantitative foundation for subsequent exposure-response analyses and regimen selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.