Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42687608›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026

Advances in New Approach Methodologies at FDA's Division of Applied Regulatory Science.

Ksenia Blinova, Kimberly Chiu, Anik Chaturbedi, Jahan Cooper, Tromondae K Feaster, Paula L Hyland, Lidiya Stavitskaya, Wendy W Wu, Jeffry Florian, Rodney Rouse

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ksenia BlinovaDivision of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1123-3152
Kimberly ChiuDivision of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7544-0666
Anik ChaturbediDivision of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8114-5820
Jahan CooperDivision of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4895-2782
Tromondae K FeasterDivision of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2102-8742
Paula L HylandDivision of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0516-3389
Lidiya StavitskayaDivision of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6307-2314
Wendy W WuDivision of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5055-4840
Jeffry FlorianDivision of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1984-8026
Rodney RouseDivision of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0463-9699

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) represent a paradigm shift in drug development and regulatory science, offering human-relevant alternatives to traditional preclinical models. This mini-review highlights recent advances in NAM development, validation, and regulatory application from FDA's Division of Applied Regulatory Science (DARS). We describe in silico NAMs including quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) modeling for opioid overdose scenarios, (quantitative) structure-activity relationship ((Q)SAR) modeling for toxicity prediction and drug-drug interaction assessment, and multi-omics approaches for pharmacodynamic biomarker discovery. Additionally, we present in vitro NAMs including human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived neural networks for opioid pharmacology assessment, microphysiological systems (MPS) for pulmonary drug permeability, gastrointestinal models for intestinal transport, and standardized cardiac ion channel and hiPSC-CM MEA assays for proarrhythmia risk prediction. These case studies demonstrate how NAMs can reduce reliance on animal studies while improving translation to clinical outcomes. The NAMs described here range from exploratory research tools to approaches actively informing regulatory submissions review. The integration of in silico and in vitro NAMs into regulatory decision-making frameworks represents a critical step toward more efficient, human-relevant drug development and safety assessments.

Identifiers

PMID42687608
PMCPMC13539334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.