ArticleKorean journal of clinical oncology2026
Nipple adenoma mimicking Paget's disease: a case report.
Article in Korean journal of clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nipple adenoma is a rare benign tumor arising from the lactiferous ducts of the nipple and may clinically mimic malignant breast conditions such as Paget's disease. Accurate diagnosis is often challenging, and histopathological confirmation is essential. A 37-year-old woman presented with a 10-month history of a red tumor on the right nipple accompanied by erosion and bloody nipple discharge. Imaging studies revealed no definite causative lesion; however, a subtle hypoechoic lesion within the nipple was noted on ultrasonography. A punch biopsy demonstrated benign proliferative glandular structures. Surgical excision was performed with complete removal of the nipple and partial resection of the areola. Histopathological examination showed ductal proliferation with a dual epithelial and myoepithelial cell layer without cytologic atypia or invasive features. Immunohistochemical staining for p63 confirmed the presence of myoepithelial cells. The postoperative course was uneventful, and no recurrence was observed at the 6-month follow-up. Nipple adenoma should be considered in patients presenting with nipple lesions. Histopathological and immunohistochemical evaluation is essential for accurate diagnosis and appropriate management, allowing differentiation from malignant conditions and avoidance of overtreatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.