ArticleJournal of liver cancer2026
Risk-based hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance thresholds using a prediction score in Asian patients with chronic hepatitis B: a nationwide cohort study.
Article in Journal of liver cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background/Aims: This study aimed to quantify hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) incidence according to a validated prediction score and to define score-based cut-offs corresponding to surveillance-relevant incidence thresholds in Asian patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) receiving antiviral therapy. Methods: We conducted a nationwide population-based cohort study using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. Adults with CHB initiating nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy between 2012 and 2023 were included; those with viral coinfections, prior malignancy, or decompensated cirrhosis were excluded. HCC risk was stratified using the HCC-RESCUE score. Incident HCC was the primary outcome. Annual HCC incidence rates and adjusted hazard ratios were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Among 199,143 treated patients (median follow-up, 7.3 years), 15,233 developed HCC. Adjusted annual HCC incidence increased progressively across risk strata: 0.31% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.40) in the low-risk group, 1.09% (95% CI, 0.84-1.41) in the intermediate-risk group, and 1.85% (95% CI, 1.44-2.40) in the high-risk group. Compared with the low-risk group, adjusted hazard ratios for HCC were 3.48 (95% CI, 3.35-3.61) and 5.90 (95% CI, 5.62-6.19) in the intermediate- and high-risk groups, respectively (all P<0.001). HCC-RESCUE scores corresponding to annual HCC incidence thresholds of 0.2%, 1.5%, and 3.0% were 47, 66, and 90. Conclusions: In a large antiviral-treated Asian CHB population, prediction score-based stratification revealed a graded spectrum of residual HCC risk and identified incidence-aligned thresholds relevant to surveillance. These findings support incidence-informed refinement of HCC surveillance strategies that complement traditional cirrhosis-based criteria in the antiviral treatment era.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.