ArticleScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2026
Biomechanics of Copenhagen Adduction Exercise and Eccentric Hip Adductor Exercises on a Novel Isokinetic Dynamometer With Within-Session Repeatability.
Article in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study biomechanically evaluated the eccentric phase of short and long lever Copenhagen adduction exercise (CAE) and compared them with unilateral and bilateral eccentric hip adductor exercises performed on a novel eccentric hip adductor dynamometer (EHAD). Fifteen participants completed two CAE variations and five EHAD exercises. Three-dimensional kinematics and force data were collected to compute peak hip joint torque, range of motion (ROM), and angle at peak torque as the primary dependent variables. Peak and mean external force and body-mass-normalized torque were reported. Effects of exercise type and lever length on primary dependent variables, as well as relative and absolute within-session repeatability, were evaluated. The CAE produced significantly lower peak eccentric torques than all EHAD variations, regardless of lever length or unilateral/bilateral performance. Long lever CAE elicited greater peak and average torques than the short lever CAE, although ROM was significantly lower in the long lever condition across exercises. EHAD exercises generated significantly greater peak torques during bilateral performance, demonstrating the presence of bilateral facilitation (27.9% ± 16.5%). Angle at peak torque was similar across all exercises (31°-39°). With the exception of angle at peak torque during the CAE, all measurements showed good to excellent relative and moderate to good absolute within-session repeatability. Increasing lever length during CAE effectively raises hip adductor loading, while all EHAD variations enable even greater loading and exhibit pronounced bilateral facilitation. Future intervention studies should determine whether these biomechanical advantages translate into clinically meaningful improvements in adductor-related groin injury prevention and rehabilitation outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.