ArticleWorld journal of surgery2026
Comparison of Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life After Mastectomy and Breast Conserving Therapy.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life After Mastectomy and Breast Conserving Therapy.World journal of surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer and its treatments have a significant impact on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQL). The aim of this study was to compare HRQL in a long-term, cross-sectional assessment after breast conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy without reconstruction, using the BREAST-Q. MATERIALS AND
methodsAltogether 500 patients who had undergone either mastectomy or BCT between 06/2016 and 8/2018 were approached. The postoperative HRQL was assessed using the BREAST-Q Breast Conserving Therapy and Mastectomy Modules.
resultsA total of 171 (34%) women participated, 85 of whom had undergone BCT and 86 mastectomy without reconstruction. The mean (SD) time from surgery to the survey was 3.3 (1) years. The mean age of the participants did not differ in the groups (p = 0.45). Compared to those who had undergone mastectomy, women with a history of BCT reported better psychosocial well-being (78 (19) vs. 66 (17), p < 0.01), sexual well-being (61 (20) vs. 41 (22), p < 0.01) and physical well-being of the chest (86 (16) vs. 77 (20), p < 0.01). They were also more satisfied with their breasts (72 (22) vs. 52 (17), p < 0.01) and reported fewer radiotherapy side effects (7 (1) vs. 8 (3), p = 0.01).
conclusionsThese data suggest that the long-term HRQL remains high after both BCT and mastectomy. However, women with a history of BCT reported higher psychosocial, sexual, and physical well-being and greater satisfaction with their breasts than those with a history of mastectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.