ArticlePharmacology research & perspectives2026
A Cohort Study on Incidence and Factors Associated With Adverse Drug Reactions of Enalapril in Lusaka, Zambia.
Article in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are widely prescribed but are associated with adverse drug reactions (ADR), including angioedema, which is typically reported in 0.1%-0.7%. Data from sub-Saharan Africa are limited. This study aimed to estimate the incidence and risk factors of enalapril-associated ADRs in a Zambian cohort, with particular focus on angioedema. We conducted an ambispective cohort study of 400 adults initiating enalapril at two tertiary hospitals in Lusaka, Zambia. Enalapril was the only ACEI available to the participants, and the primary outcome was the occurrence of enalapril-associated ADRs requiring treatment discontinuation or modification. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate event-free survival, and Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify factors associated with ADR occurrence. Angioedema occurred in 19/400 participants (4.8%). Overall, 22% (88/400) of participants experienced at least one ADR impacting treatment. The most frequent ADRs were cough (10.3%) and dizziness (5.0%). In multivariable analysis, male sex was independently associated with a lower risk of ADR (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.59, 95% CI 0.37-0.93). No significant associations were identified for the high rate of angioedema. The incidence of enalapril-associated angioedema in this cohort was substantially higher than that reported in global as well as African American populations. These findings have clinical relevance for prescribing and monitoring ACEIs in sub-Saharan African populations. Further studies are needed to confirm this signal and explore underlying mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.