ArticleBMC oral health2026
Population-adapted Nolla method for dental age estimation in Northwestern Romanian children.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAccurate dental age (DA) estimation is essential in pediatric dentistry, orthodontic treatment planning, and forensic practice; however, the applicability of international reference standards varies across populations. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of a population-adapted Nolla method for dental age estimation in children from northwestern Romania and to compare its performance with the original approach. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 860 digital panoramic radiographs of children aged 3-15 years. Dental development was assessed using the Nolla staging system, and a third-degree polynomial regression model was developed to estimate chronological age (CA) based on the total Nolla score. Model performance was evaluated using coefficient of determination (R²), five-fold cross-validation, and non-parametric statistical tests.
resultsThe original Nolla method underestimated CA by approximately 1.5 years. The population-specific model showed strong predictive performance (R² = 0.846; cross-validated R² = 0.84) and close agreement between estimated DA and CA (mean difference 0.000 ± 0.976 years; p = 0.983). Accuracy was stable across most age groups, although larger deviations were observed after 12 years. Girls showed slightly more advanced dental maturation than boys, but differences were clinically small.
conclusionsThe proposed population-calibrated equation eliminates systematic bias and provides a reliable tool for dental age estimation in children from northwestern Romania, although external validation is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.