Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42687162›Full record

Trial reportBMC oral health2026

Clinical performance of a giomer-based pit and fissure sealant with and without air-abrasion pretreatment: a 12-month randomized clinical trial.

Yomna Sayed Khallaf, Olfat Elsayed Hassanein, Aya Mohamed Adly, Dina Kamal

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06003452 (Retention Rate And Caries Prevention Of Giomer Based Sealant With And Without Pre-Treatment With Bioactive Glass Air Abrasion In Young Adults), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06003452 nacompletednot on this map

Retention Rate And Caries Prevention Of Giomer Based Sealant With And Without Pre-Treatment With Bioactive Glass Air Abrasion In Young Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled96ConditionsDental CariesArmssurface treatment with Bioactive Glass Air Abrasion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yomna Sayed KhallafConservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, 11 Al-Saraya Street, Al-Manial, Cairo, Egypt. yomna.sayed@dentistry.cu.edu.eg.
Olfat Elsayed HassaneinConservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, 11 Al-Saraya Street, Al-Manial, Cairo, Egypt.
Aya Mohamed AdlyConservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, 11 Al-Saraya Street, Al-Manial, Cairo, Egypt.
Dina KamalConservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, 11 Al-Saraya Street, Al-Manial, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPit and fissure sealants are widely used for caries prevention; however, their long-term success depends largely on retention. Giomer-based sealants containing surface pre-reacted glass ionomer fillers offer bioactive properties, yet concerns remain regarding their bonding durability when applied with mild self-etch primers. This randomized clinical trial evaluated the effect of bioactive glass air-abrasion pretreatment on the retention and caries preventive efficacy of a giomer-based sealant in young adults over 12 months.

methodsThis parallel-arm randomized clinical trial included 96 participants, each contributing one eligible sound permanent molar (n = 48 per group). Participants were randomly allocated to either bioactive glass air-abrasion pretreatment followed by application of a giomer-based sealant (intervention group) or application of the same sealant without pretreatment (comparator group). Sealant retention and secondary caries incidence were evaluated at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months using Simonsen's criteria, and modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria, respectively. The primary outcome was sealant retention at 12 months, whereas secondary caries incidence was assessed as a secondary outcome. Intergroup comparisons were analyzed using the Chi-square test. Intragroup comparisons were analyzed using Cochran's Q test followed by multiple comparisons. Relative risk with 95% confidence intervals was calculated. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.

resultsAt 6 months, complete sealant retention was observed in 91.7% of teeth in the intervention group and 75.0% in the comparator group, with no statistically significant difference between groups (p = 0.068). At 12 months, complete sealant retention was significantly higher in the intervention group (87.5%) than in the comparator group (33.3%) (p < 0.0001). Teeth in the intervention group exhibited an 81.25% lower risk of sealant retention failure compared with the comparator group (RR = 0.1875; 95% CI: 0.0864-0.4069; p < 0.0001). No differences in secondary caries incidence were detected between groups during the 12-month follow-up period (p = 1.0000).

conclusionsBioactive glass air-abrasion pretreatment significantly improved the retention of a giomer-based fissure sealant compared with sealant application without pretreatment. No differences in secondary caries incidence were detected between groups during the 12-month follow-up period. Incorporating mechanical surface conditioning prior to sealant placement may enhance sealant retention without compromising preventive efficacy.

trial registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/ , (NCT06003452), 15-08-2023.

Indexed as

Air Abrasion, DentalDental CariesGlass Ionomer CementsPit and Fissure SealantsDental BondingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMolarSurface PropertiesTreatment OutcomeGlass Ionomer CementsPit and Fissure SealantsAir-abrasion pretreatmentGiomer-based sealantPit and fissure sealantRandomized clinical trialSealant retention

Identifiers

PMID42687162
PMCPMC13539805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.