Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42687160›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2026

Congenital encephalomeningocele presenting as a giant orbital mass in a neonate: a case report.

Xiangxiang Chen, Yanyan Ni, Canyang Zhan

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiangxiang ChenDepartment of Neonatology, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Children and Adolescents' Health and Diseases, Hangzhou, China. chenxiangxiang@zju.edu.cn.
Yanyan NiDepartment of Neonatology, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Children and Adolescents' Health and Diseases, Hangzhou, China.
Canyang ZhanDepartment of Neonatology, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Children and Adolescents' Health and Diseases, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCongenital orbital masses encompass a broad spectrum of etiologies, among which encephalomeningocele is exceedingly rare and particularly diagnostically challenging when atypical. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a 2-hour-old female neonate who presented with a giant left orbital mass causing marked proptosis. Imaging revealed a mixed cystic-solid lesion with calcifications and septations, but no bony defect was identified preoperatively. A transcranial approach was performed, revealing a small orbital roof defect with herniation into the anterior cranial fossa. Histopathology confirmed encephalomeningocele. The surgery successfully preserved the globe, although mild lagophthalmos resulted in exposure keratopathy. Follow-up imaging showed a small residual lesion.

conclusionsThis case highlights that congenital orbital encephalomeningocele can present with atypical features, including a giant lesion with a disproportionately small bone defect that was not detectable on imaging, particularly in neonates. Histopathology is essential for diagnosis, and encephalomeningocele should be considered in the differential diagnosis of congenital orbital masses even when classic imaging findings are lacking.

Indexed as

EncephaloceleOrbitOrbital DiseasesDiagnosis, DifferentialExophthalmosFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedEncephalomeningoceleNeonateOrbital mass

Identifiers

PMID42687160
PMCPMC13540067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.