ArticleSpine deformity2026
Characterizing neurological complications following anterior-to-the-psoas vertebral body tethering in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: The role of neuromonitoring, psoas location, and screw placement.
Article in Spine deformity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine whether changes in intraoperative neuromonitoring with saphenous nerve somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) stimulation, preoperative assessment of lumbar plexus location, and screw placement, are associated with thigh paresthesia development following an anterior-to-the-psoas (ATP) approach for vertebral body tethering (VBT) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients.
methods39 patients who underwent a thoracoabdominal ATP approach for VBT with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Neurologic monitoring variables, including saphenous nerve SSEPs and quadriceps motor evoked potentials (MEPs), psoas location, an indicator of lumbar plexus location, and screw placement were compared between patients with and without postoperative thigh paresthesia. Demographics and outcomes were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test as appropriate, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.
results41% of patients experienced postoperative thigh paresthesia. Additionally, 10% reported transient thigh numbness. No patients developed motor deficits. Lumbar plexus position and screw distance did not significantly differ between groups, and no neuromonitoring alarms occurred during psoas retraction. Although changes in quadriceps MEPs were not statistically associated with postoperative sensory symptoms, a higher proportion of patients with paresthesia demonstrated MEP changes (50% vs 19%, p = 0.063) and decreased MEP amplitudes (31% vs 13%, p = 0.077), representing a directional difference. All sensory symptoms resolved without intervention at a mean of 5.3 ± 5.6 weeks and a median of 2.5 (IQR 1-10).
conclusionChanges in intraoperative neuromonitoring with saphenous nerve SSEP stimulation, psoas location, and screw positioning were not statistically associated with postoperative thigh paresthesia following the ATP approach for VBT in AIS patients. However, a directional difference was observed between quadriceps MEP changes and postoperative thigh paresthesia. These findings highlight the complexity of neurologic responses and support further investigation into patient-specific anatomy, surgical technique, and optimization of neuromonitoring strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42687088What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.