ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2026
A Validation Study of the Female Sexual Function Index for Use in Pregnant and Postpartum Samples.
Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sexual function problems are common during the perinatal period, with prevalence estimates ranging from 36 to 88%. Low desire, arousal and lubrication difficulties, dyspareunia, and orgasm problems are frequently reported, yet few measures have been developed for pregnancy and postpartum populations. Most research has relied on the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), although its psychometric properties in perinatal samples remain largely untested. Guided by contemporary validity theory, this study examined the validity of the FSFI scores in samples of sexually active pregnant and postpartum individuals. Factor analyses supported a six-domain structure (desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, pain), whereas models including a total score were not supported. Items discriminated well at low-to-average levels of sexual function but less effectively at higher levels, suggesting the FSFI is more informative for pregnant and postpartum individuals with poorer sexual function or with sexual difficulties. With a few exceptions, evidence from associations with external variables indicated that FSFI domain scores are sensitive to individual differences in sexual function and distinguish individuals with and without distressing sexual difficulties. Overall, findings suggest that FSFI domain scores provide a meaningful assessment of perinatal sexual function and are good indicators of the underlying constructs. However, the use of a total score is not supported. Further research is warranted to address identified limitations. In the meantime, researchers and clinicians should interpret FSFI total score results cautiously, as well as results from domain scores that showed weaker performance (sexual arousal and sexual satisfaction).
Indexed as
Identifiers
42687074What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.