ArticleCulture, medicine and psychiatry2026
"I Really Feel Heard by AI": A Cultural Case Study of AI-Mediated Listening Across China and the UK.
Article in Culture, medicine and psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing use of generative AI for emotional support has prompted growing debate about the future of mental health care. This article suggests that such reliance is better understood not simply as a technological shift, but as symptomatic of a wider crisis in the politics of listening. This cultural case study examines the experiences of Lily, a 24-year-old Chinese migrant woman navigating emotional distress across uneven care infrastructures in China and the UK. Drawing on person-centred ethnography, it shows how AI chatbots come to function as provisional sites of care under conditions of precarity, gendered obligation, and moralised endurance. The analysis conceptualises these chatbot interactions as a care-patch: a temporary form of digital holding that emerges where human listening is scarce, delayed, or experienced as burdensome. Rather than treating AI use as a matter of technological adoption, the case situates AI-mediated listening within culturally specific moral relations of obligation and responsibility. In doing so, it reframes therapeutic automation as an index of the erosion of listening as a shared social good and redirects attention to the political and ethical challenge of rebuilding infrastructures of human listening capable of absorbing distress without extracting it, outsourcing it, or returning it as blame.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.