ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2026
Procedure-specific environmental microbiological monitoring in IVF laboratories: the SMILE multicenter study.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEnvironmental microbiological monitoring is mandatory in IVF laboratories; however, procedure-specific risk assessment across the entire medically assisted reproduction workflow remains limited. This multicenter study, named "SMILE" (Study of Environmental Microbiological Monitoring in IVF Laboratories), aimed to assess settle plate positivity as a surrogate marker of environmental microbial contamination risk, in compliance with the guidelines of the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM). Passive air monitoring using settle plates was performed during individual IVF laboratory procedures under different environmental cleanliness conditions.
methodsNine IVF laboratories in Northern Italy prospectively collected environmental microbiological monitoring data between 2023 and 2025. Passive air monitoring using settle plates was performed during seven routine IVF procedures. Monitoring was conducted either under GMP Grade A laminar airflow or at the micromanipulation workstation in the validated GMP Grade D background environment (ICSI and embryo biopsy). A total of 2146 sentinel settle plates were exposed and incubated according to EDQM recommendations. Contamination probability was defined as the proportion of plates with ≥ 1 colony-forming unit (CFU), with exact 95% confidence intervals. Step-specific and cumulative contamination risks were estimated assuming independence, and associations with environmental cleanliness class and exposure time were analyzed.
resultsProcedures performed in GMP Grade D environments showed a significantly higher percentage of settle-plate positivity than those performed in GMP Grade A (26.0% [95% CI 21.5-31.0%] vs 2.2% [95% CI 1.6-3.0%], p < 0.001). Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and embryo biopsy were associated with the highest contamination rates. The cumulative probability of detecting at least one contaminated settle plate was 11.2% (95% CI 7.8-14.6%) for procedures performed exclusively in GMP Grade A environments, increasing to 35.1% (95% CI 30.0-40.1%) including ICSI, and to 47.4% (95% CI 38.2-56.5%) when all procedures were considered. Exposure time was associated with an increased risk of settle plate positivity in the complete procedural set, which included Grade D procedures.
conclusionsEnvironmental microbiological burden in IVF laboratories is procedure-dependent and strongly associated with environmental cleanliness class. These findings support a procedure-specific, risk-based approach to environmental monitoring in MAR laboratories using settle plate-based air monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42687052What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.