ArticleMolecular psychiatry2026
Heterogeneous structural brain signatures of methamphetamine and ketamine use disorders revealed by normative modeling.
Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Marked interindividual heterogeneity in substance use disorder (SUD) impedes the identification of consistent neuroanatomical alterations, limiting the development of robust markers for clinical risk stratification. We applied a normative modeling framework to explore individual neuroanatomical deviations in individuals with SUD across two distinct substance classes, and assessed their potential for classification and risk prediction. We established a developmental normative model of gray matter volume (GMV) using T1-weighted images from 1209 healthy individuals aged 18-65 years. Deviations from this normative model were then estimated for 184 individuals with methamphetamine use disorder (MUD), 94 with ketamine use disorder (KUD), and 220 healthy controls (HC) collected from two independent sites. Based on these individual deviation scores, a machine learning model was constructed to identify individuals at risk for SUD. The normative model revealed high interindividual heterogeneity in GMV deviations among individuals with MUD and KUD. Cross-substance extreme negative deviations were primarily located in regions of the default mode network (DMN). Notably, individual-level deviations could successfully distinguish both MUD and KUD from HC, and replicated in an external dataset. We further identified significant associations between abnormal GMV trajectories and neurobiological features, particularly myelination and neurotransmitter systems. These findings enhance our understanding of the heterogeneous neurobiology underlying SUD, providing potential neurobiological biomarkers for clinical diagnosis, risk stratification, and prevention.
Identifiers
42686998What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.