Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42686996›Full record

ArticleMolecular psychiatry2026

Neurophysiological signatures of Stanford Neuromodulation Therapy in treatment resistant depression.

Davide Momi, Derrick M Buchanan, Masataka Wada, Andrew D Geoly, Noriah J Johnson, Eleanor J Cole, Adi Maron-Katz, Claudia Tischler, Christopher C Cline, Diego A Pizzagalli and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03068715 (Stanford Accelerated Intelligent Neuromodulation Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03068715 nacompletednot on this map

Stanford Accelerated Intelligent Neuromodulation Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression (SAINT-TRD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2017 to 2021Enrolled30ConditionsTreatment Resistant DepressionArmsActive TBS-DLPFC, Sham TBS-DLPFC, Open label TBS-DLPFC
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Davide MomiDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA. momi.davide89@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6048-8296
Derrick M BuchananDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA.
Masataka WadaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3937-3619
Andrew D GeolyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3483-026X
Noriah J JohnsonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA.
Eleanor J ColeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA.
Adi Maron-KatzDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA.
Claudia TischlerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6412-4078
Christopher C ClineWu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Diego A PizzagalliNoel Drury, M.D. Institute for Translational Depression Discoveries, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7772-1143
Manish SaggarDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5307-2249
Daphne VoineskosTemerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
John D GriffithsKrembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Canada.
Camarin E Rolle *Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA.
Corey J Keller *Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0529-3490
Nolan Williams *Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4368-3203

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) affects approximately 30% of patients with major depressive disorder. Stanford Neuromodulation Therapy (SNT), a high-dose intermittent theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol, produces rapid antidepressant effects, but its neurophysiological mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we used longitudinal TMS-EEG to characterize the progressive neurophysiological changes induced by SNT, assess their site-specificity, and explore whether baseline neural markers are associated with clinical response. We conducted a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial at Stanford University (2017-2018; analysis August 2024-October 2025) in 24 TMS-naïve participants with TRD (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale ≥20; ≥1 failed antidepressant trial). Participants were randomized to active (n = 12) or sham (n = 12) SNT, consisting of 10 sessions per day over 5 consecutive days targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (90,000 pulses). TMS-EEG was acquired at two baseline sessions, before and after each treatment session, and at 1-month follow-up (14 TMS-EEG sessions in total). Active SNT progressively reduced cortical excitability at the treatment site, with significant decreases by day 3 in the early window component (-27.9%; P < 0.01), while no changes were observed at the vertex control site. Site-specific comparisons confirmed early window reductions only at the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (t₂₂ = -3.82; P < 0.001). SNT also selectively decreased estimated medial prefrontal source activity consistent with the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC) across sessions (F₁₃,₂₂₂ = 4.93; P < 0.001), with effects persisting at 1-month follow-up. In an exploratory analysis in the active group (n = 12), higher baseline estimated sgACC source activity was associated with greater clinical improvement (r = -0.67; P = 0.023); although promising, the latter preliminary finding requires replication in larger, adequately powered samples before predictive utility can be established. These findings indicate that SNT induces progressive, site-specific cortical modulation and selective downstream effects on estimated sgACC source activity. Early cortical excitability changes represent candidate neurophysiological markers of SNT response, while the observed association between baseline sgACC activity and clinical outcome, while preliminary, motivates prospective investigation of subcortical source activity as a potential predictor of treatment response in larger trials. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03068715.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.