ArticleBone marrow transplantation2026
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide in patients with acute myeloid leukemia achieving first complete remission after one versus two inductions: a study from the ALWP/EBMT.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is a potentially curative treatment for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and outcomes are strongly influenced by disease status at transplantation. In transplants using conventional graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, outcomes also depend on the number of induction courses required to achieve first complete remission (CR1); however, this has not been evaluated in patients receiving post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). We retrospectively analyzed 677 adult AML patients transplanted in CR1 between 2012 and 2022 using PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis. Outcomes were compared between patients achieving CR1 after one induction course (n = 518) and those requiring two courses (n = 159). Baseline characteristics, donor type, conditioning intensity, graft source, engraftment, and rates of acute and chronic GVHD were comparable between groups. Patients requiring two inductions had a higher 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (27% vs. 19.3%; HR 1.75, p = 0.003). However, no significant differences were observed in 2-year overall survival (62.8% vs. 69%), leukemia-free survival (61.1% vs. 65%), GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (46.3% vs. 50.4%), or non-relapse mortality (11.9% vs. 15.7%). In AML patients receiving alloHSCT with PTCy, outcomes were largely similar regardless of whether CR1 was achieved after one or two-induction courses, with relapse incidence being higher in patients requiring 2 inductions.
Identifiers
42686993What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.