ReviewNeurocritical care2026
Education and Ethical Guidance for Organ Donation at the End-of-Life: An Ethical Guidance Statement from the Neurocritical Care Society.
Review in Neurocritical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The neurocritical care treatment team frequently interacts with patient surrogates and Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs) at the end-of-life. A 2025 survey of Neurocritical Care Society (NCS) members assessing experiences and attitudes related to organ donation identified the need to enhance education for the treatment team about organ donation and opportunities for improvement in palliative interventions after withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies for potential donation after cardiac death/death by circulatory-respiratory criteria. Additionally, members noted concerns regarding blurred boundaries between patient care and care directed towards organ donation; a potential lack of transparency, empathy and cultural sensitivity in communication between OPOs and patient surrogates; and the ethics of first-person authorization for organ donation. In response to these concerns, the NCS Ethics Committee developed this statement to provide education and ethical guidance for organ donation at the end-of-life. Members had an opportunity to share feedback on the statement from April 6-19, 2026. This statement provides an informal narrative review of the literature related to organ donation that is pertinent to the care of potential organ donors at the end-of-life and includes practical guidance related to the legal definitions of death and first-person authorization, collaborative communication, and management of potential conflicts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42686991What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.